If you have been on Yelp and other sites which review places or things, like Amazon product reviews, don’t you hate the users who determine their rating points based on a minuscule aspect of the restaurant, product or whatever? Like for example, people who give restaurants with amazing food one star simply because they couldn’t find parking? Or they slammed a a kitchen appliance because it didn’t come in a color that they liked. One wonders if there was someway to develop an algorithm which could remove the scoring on reviews which slammed something due to a non-core attribute being rated low. I guess that is one of the issues with crowdsourced ratings and reviews, how do you keep the quality level of a rating consistent. If I write a review, its usually based on either promoting a place/product that I’m going to/using to others, or dissuading them from going to/purchasing it. But as I look over both Yelp and Amazon reviews, especially the negative ones, they are rife with ratings crushing complaints about minor aspects – at least in my opinion.

I’m guessing that this is not a trivial problem – unless you are able to map the data points and give the user a specific set of attributes to rate on, how can you get a clean sense of the ratings of a place/thing with all of the extraneous mumbo-jumbo removed. Something to think about – maybe a startup focused on scrubbing the unimportant data from the set would be interesting.

hellofuture helps you create innovative new products, services and patents via our foresight, innovation and patent development programs. Make a dent in the universe; build your next billion dollar business.
Subscribe to our twice weekly newsletter, thinkfuture pulse:  
Chris Kalaboukis
Follow Me

Chris Kalaboukis

CEO / Co-Founder at hellofuture
Chris is a prolific inventor (60+ patents), exceptional innovator (headed internal banking, retail and technology innovation programs), experienced technologist, serial entrepreneur and futurist.
Chris Kalaboukis
Follow Me