Something That Bugs Me About User Reviews
If you have been on Yelp and other sites which review places or things, like Amazon product reviews, don’t you hate the users who determine their rating points based on a minuscule aspect of the restaurant, product or whatever? Like for example, people who give restaurants with amazing food one star simply because they couldn’t find parking? Or they slammed a a kitchen appliance because it didn’t come in a color that they liked. One wonders if there was someway to develop an algorithm which could remove the scoring on reviews which slammed something due to a non-core attribute being rated low. I guess that is one of the issues with crowdsourced ratings and reviews, how do you keep the quality level of a rating consistent. If I write a review, its usually based on either promoting a place/product that I’m going to/using to others, or dissuading them from going to/purchasing it. But as I look over both Yelp and Amazon reviews, especially the negative ones, they are rife with ratings crushing complaints about minor aspects – at least in my opinion.
I’m guessing that this is not a trivial problem – unless you are able to map the data points and give the user a specific set of attributes to rate on, how can you get a clean sense of the ratings of a place/thing with all of the extraneous mumbo-jumbo removed. Something to think about – maybe a startup focused on scrubbing the unimportant data from the set would be interesting.
Latest posts by Chris Kalaboukis (see all)
- When you Innovate, Think About the Elephant in the Room - May 25, 2017
- To Innovate, You May Have to Repeat Yourself, Repeatedly - May 23, 2017
- Why You Need Dedicated Innovators Innovating Innovations - May 18, 2017