The Politics Of Innovation
Let’s talk about the Politics of Innovation
Last Friday, Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th president of the United States. What can the new administration do to help us to be more innovative?
In my view, the theme I’ve talked about several times over the years on my blog and this forthcoming book that I’m writing called So Where’s My Flying Car? is that innovation requires freedom. It requires the ability to think freely. It requires the ability to put your filters to the side no matter what they’d be whether they be legal, ethical or whatever. It requires the ability to suspend any kind of restrictions on what you can think about and do, to push the envelope.
To that end, I was suggesting that one of the things that will help assist in the development of new innovative products and services is deregulation.
Here’s an example. Look at banking. Banking in the United States is extremely heavily regulated. Therefore, it’s very difficult for banks, no matter how innovative they are internally, to be able to launch innovative new products externally because they must deal with a lot of regulation and compliance issues. Go to other countries like Kenya where the banks have been able to do all sorts of interesting and amazing things with mobile banking because the regulations are more lax.
In places where regulations are lax, you see a lot more innovation and interesting products and services coming to market. Government can assist in innovating by stepping back and rolling back certain regulations. Not every regulation, but certain regulations can be rolled back to assist in the development of innovations.
I talked about this a previous post when I talked about permissionless innovation, where you push forward into areas where there are no laws or the laws can be bent or the laws can be stretched to get that innovative product service out the door. Why can’t the administration encourage more innovation by requiring less permission in the first place?
Strengthening The Patent System
Of course, it doesn’t inhibit you from just thinking about innovation: if you want to develop patents in that space that’s completely fine. Strengthening the patent system so people who do come up with ideas are protected and can do something with those ideas would be helpful here.
Putting Ethics Aside Temporarily
Secondly, some innovation makes people queasy. When you see something extremely interesting and innovative, people get uncomfortable. They get little queasy about it and they’re concerned about it that their ethical filters or even sensual filters kick in.
Think about the future of water use. Here in California we have a drought and it’s raining today so hopefully, it will reduce over time. In one of my previous blog posts I talk about a scientist who hadn’t taken a shower in twelve years. All he does is spritz himself with this anti-bacterial substance and what it does it destroys the bacteria on his skin. He’s used very little water over the course of the last twelve years.
If you think about it, that is the future of showering. Do we really need to use as much water as we do to be clean? Can’t we have high tech shower which uses some water and some biological elements that kill the bacteria and then just sort of blast us with this thing for a couple of seconds cleaning us completely and then we step out again?
But some don’t like the thought of peppering ourselves of bacteria, it makes a few people a little queasy. Feeling uneasy about something may mean something is actually more innovative.
Let’s talk a little bit about ethics. Think about the start of flight when people were still trying to determine how to get off the ground. How do we get humans to fly? Wilbur and Orville Wright could get off the ground but think about the others.
Hundreds of people tried, a lot of people were hurt or were killed trying to get off the ground. A lot of people died attempting to fly. If you think about the risk taking that was done at that time as opposed to today, I cannot imagine many (or any) people taking that kind of risk to determine whether we could fly.
We live in a completely different time where people are more concerned about safety than innovation.
Ethics are one of the reasons why the FDA takes so long to push drugs through the system. They must test every possible situation and it takes forever. Even though there are many people waiting in the wings who need these cures.
Can you imagine people trying to get human beings off the ground willing to die trying? Is anyone, any longer willing to die trying for innovation? Are people willing to die trying to cure cancer? Are people willing to die trying to cure HIV? Are people willing to die trying to cure homelessness?
People are not willing to take risks anymore and I think an administration that encourages people to take risks, to temporarily suspend some ethical thinking, in order to create some breakthrough innovation, would be extremely helpful.
Creating Innovation Zones
The last thing that I would suggest is something that I’ve called Innovation Zones.
If we are too queasy to deregulate and bypass our ethical filters all over the country, I would say set up some specific areas within the country, where people can go and do these risky things.
Basically, what would happen in these areas is that there’s a lifting of restrictions and laws. People who wanted to could travel to these innovation zones and upon entering these innovation zones they would sign a waiver saying anything that happens in this zone is their complete responsibility. If they were to be disabled, or hurt in any way, or even killed, they take full responsibility for this.
They would be free within these innovation zones to do all sorts of things which may be illegal outside of the innovation zone. They could create breakthroughs in many areas that would never be able to due to the laws, regulations, and restrictions elsewhere.
Many innovators are leaving the United States to go to other countries where the laws are laxer. So instead of having those people leave the country to go to these other countries where the laws are laxer, have them go to these innovation zones and work from there.
I’m not trying to kill anybody intimate trying to hurt anybody. We just need to recapture that same spirit that we had back at the turn of the last century where people were willing to take the risk to create new forward-thinking innovations.
We need to bring that sense of adventure and excitement and disruption back to our country and hopefully, that’s something that we can see from this incoming administration.
Latest posts by Chris Kalaboukis (see all)
- 5 Factors Of A Personal Innovation Quotient - March 23, 2017
- INNOVATION MASTERY 19: Rewarding Your Inventors: Experiences [VIDEO] - March 22, 2017
- Sometimes You Need to Violate the Prime Directive - March 21, 2017