talking innovation
future
Applied vs Theoretical Innovation
Jun 29th
Recently, I got to thinking that there are really are two kinds of innovation, and these two types of innovation were very apparent in the kind of programs I would run for companies. Borrowing a term from physics, I like to call these two types of innovation “theoretical” and “applied” just like theoretical and applied physics.
Theoretical innovation is something you simply just cannot do today. There are factors which keep you from actually implementing the envisioned product or service right now. These can be something as simple as the right kind of technology, say size of storage space or wireless bandwidth or as complex as the right geo-political infrastructures. A good example of this is streaming HD virtual reality to wireless phones. Sure, it can be done: but the network is simply not up to the task of allowing it to happen.
Tech factors, strangely enough, are not usually the ones holding back the innovation: it’s more likely the human factor, factions within companies taking credit or laying blame, cultural and political reasons etc. However, the biggest indicator of something being “theoretical innovation” in my view is ability to monetize. If there is no way to make any money off it, even if all barriers were lowered, then it remains in that realm since most no one, save some independently wealthy, or governments, will step up to take it on. It’s this type of innovation which is ideally suited to go into a patent application process.
Applied Innovation, on the other hand, is leading edge work that not only pushes the envelope, it also has a clear path to monetization. If you ask me, this is pretty easy to come up with: is it a product or service that I would use and pay for? Applied innovation takes what is out there today, and rebuilds or mashes it up to create something new, useful and valuable. Applied innovation is the kind of thing that can be taken from idea to launch in days or weeks with a few guys in a garage. And its applied innovation which is probably what most people think about, at least in the business world, as innovation.
Thats not to say that theoretical innovation doesn’t have its place, and many ideas began in the theoretical innovation space, but as these ideas have much longer paths, or in some cases no path to monetization at all, now may not be the best time to pursue theoretical innovation. In boom times, with the wind at our backs, of course, but today, in this climate, a focus on applied innovation is essential.
Social Avatar Beats Death « NextNature.net
Jun 29th
Social Avatar Beats Death
Avatars are commonly known as virtual characters in the digital realm representing a user. But what if avatars could house personal history, profile and ideas? Could that enable us to make decisions after we have died?
LifeNaut, has a free service called “Mind File” that lets you digitally backup the organic brain:
“A Mindfile is a web-based storage space for organizing and preserving critical information (digital reflections) about one’s unique and essential characteristics for the future, and to share with friends and relatives in the present.”
The subscribing process comes down to putting stuff in a database, including an expressionless photo, which LifeNaut automatically turns into a lifelike, blinking and talking avatar that functions as a visual interface, ready to interact with you and others – including your descendants!
Backup your brain and live forever.
tweebus
May 18th
tweebus. captures tweet streams, extracts links, photos and videos and makes it easy to track your favorite interests on twitter. check it out.
Control Things with Your Brain!
Feb 3rd
Who wouldn’t want this?
—
Ever wish you could move objects using only your thoughts?
That vision is becoming closer to reality. Toronto-based Interaxon has created technology that lets users control a series of lights using only their minds.
via Want light? Just think about it | Beyond Binary – CNET News.
Apple Creates ST:TNG PADD?
Jan 26th
Just wait until the tablet is launched. Anyone remember the Newton? Great example of being too early. Question is: if the tablet is just a bigger iPhone, who really needs it? Me, of course. The Apple Tablet is simply the PADD from Star Trek: Next Generation come to life. I NEED that
Apple's holiday quarter was especially sweet thanks to strong iPhone and Macintosh computer sales, sending shares higher Tuesday.
via My Way News – Apple rockets to most profitable quarter ever.
FUNCTIONALL
Jan 26th
As we wanted to keep things straightforward and hands-on this month, were highlighting “FUNCTIONALL”. Which is all about a new breed of products that are simple, small and/or cheap with a dash of sustainability, giving them global appeal, from India to Sweden. Now, if that doesnt warrant a brainstorming session…
via trendwatching.coms February 2010 Trend Briefing covering “FUNCTIONALL”.
Next Phase Of Evolution: Using Tech To Augment Ourselves
Sep 28th
…this year, the limelight will be on the era that is to come — and a movement called Transhumanism, which supports the use of technology to improve the human condition.
via Spotlight – Woodstock – In Film Festival, Woodstock Looks to the Future – NYTimes.com.
The next phase of human evolution, IMHO, is us using technology we have developed in order to augment ourselves. Why wait for real evolution when we can evolve ourselves right now. We are already cyborgs in some sense anyways…
Future is TV-shaped, says Intel
Sep 25th
By 2015 more than 12 billion devices will be capable of connecting to 500 billion hours of TV and video content, says chip giant Intel.
via BBC NEWS | Technology | Future is TV-shaped, says Intel.
What surgery will look like in the future
Sep 24th
A new exhibition at London’s Royal College of Surgeons called “Sci-Fi Surgery: Medical Robots” has displays ranging from the “da Vinci” system to prototype microbots designed to be swallowed and self-assembled in the human body.
Not-So-Risky Business
Sep 24th
Disruptive innovation is often fraught with unknowns and assumptions. But that doesn’t mean it has to be “risky business.” By utilizing a different type of approach–an approach that systematically attacks the most critical unknowns with tailored, low-cost experiments–innovators can systematically “de-risk” their strategies and thereby increase their chances of success while lowering the associated investment cost.